>>647866I am aware that most food crops don't look like their most original form.
It's still bred from the original possible genetics programmed by God.
A banana could take many forms but it will never turn into grapes, we can observe the process of genetic mutation fairly quickly by artificial selection and inbreeding. We turned grey wolves into chihuahuas, but they're still canines. This is the exact same biological process that allegedly drives Darwinism, just artificial selection instead of natural.
There's zero evidence that if you gave it more time, it'd change a lifeform into a different kind.
It's really dumb to think genetic mutations (overwhelmingly deleterious/harmful) could do this no matter how much you stretch out the time scale, it doesn't take very long to OBSERVE, through REPEATABLE and VERIFIABLE means, the possibilities of mutation and the fact that it deletes data over time, not gains it. This right here alone proves Darwinism is impossible.
It's why you took a grey wolf and only got worse, more retarded sickly dogs. All you're doing is deleting data.